Back to Security
    Security
    Financial Services
    8 weeks from assessment through production deployment

    Improving Threat Detection for a Financial Services Firm

    Investment management firm with 150 employees managing sensitive client financial data. Two-person security team responsible for monitoring, incident response, and compliance.

    The Challenge

    The security team was overwhelmed by alerts from multiple tools. SIEM, endpoint protection, and email security each generated hundreds of daily alerts with significant overlap.

    Alert fatigue meant potential threats were being missed or investigated too slowly. The team could not distinguish high-priority alerts from noise without manual review.

    Security operations were entirely reactive. The team spent all available time responding to alerts rather than improving detection capabilities or hunting for threats.

    Our Approach

    We conducted an alert volume analysis to understand what was being generated and why. Over 60% of alerts were false positives or duplicates from multiple tools detecting the same activity.

    Detection rules were tuned to reduce false positives while maintaining coverage of genuine threats. We eliminated redundant detections across tools.

    We implemented automated triage for common alert patterns. Known false positives are suppressed automatically, and known-good patterns are closed without analyst review.

    Escalation workflows were built to route confirmed threats to the right responders based on severity and type. Critical alerts page on-call staff immediately.

    We established baseline metrics for detection and response times to measure ongoing performance and identify areas for improvement.

    Security Operations Flow

    1

    Security Tools

    SIEM, endpoint, email, and network security tools generate alerts

    2

    Alert Aggregation

    Alerts are collected and deduplicated across tools

    3

    Automated Triage

    Known patterns are handled automatically: suppress, auto-respond, or queue for review

    4

    Analyst Queue

    Remaining alerts are prioritized by risk score for analyst review

    5

    Investigation

    Analysts investigate queued alerts with full context available

    6

    Response

    Confirmed threats trigger response workflows based on severity

    Results

    Daily alert volume reduced from 500+ to under 100 actionable items
    Mean time to investigate dropped from 4 hours to 45 minutes
    Zero missed critical alerts in first 6 months after implementation
    Security team reallocated 20+ hours weekly from alert triage to proactive security work

    Facing a Similar Challenge?

    We would like to understand your situation and explore how we can help. No sales pressure, just a conversation about what is possible.